Longineu

Aí crl. Esta connection do Flávio X Gabi tá do crl

O doumbia sim senhor

Banger. Flávio e Gabriel 💚💚

60 milhões, amigos.

Talvez estejam só a levar as coisas do Fotis com cuidado para não ter mais uma lesão? Ele vem de uma de quê, 6 meses?

Tinha me esquecido de ver os dois ultimos de Widow's Bay. Vi agora.

https://www.instagram.com/p/Davg1poMmDS/ camisola principal. coisa linda crl

jesse what the fuck are you talking about

Vi o Obsession ontem. Masterpiece. Hec: Pretty majestical, aye? Ricky Baker: I don't think that's a word. Hec: Majestical? Sure it is. Ricky Baker: Nah, it's not real. Hec: What would you know? Ricky Baker: It's majestic. Hec: That doesn't sound very special, majestical's way better. Que descanse em paz num sitio majestical. ❤️

no shit, capt obvious. daí a não "estar cheio dele" ainda vai um bom bocado. estamos a falar de um gajo que passou pelo barcelona, premier league e é um dos mais bem pagps no sporting com 3M por ano (ou perto disso).

a falta de noção que um gajo tem que ter para dizer uma m*rda destas.

e vais ter musica ao intervalo.

Obrigado Morten 💚Vou ter imensas saudades.

O Toy é amigo dos Trivium. Nem pode haver comparação.

A França é a melhor equipa do mundial mas de longe.

Quanto a esta discussão inutil do Palhinha/Ugarte, eles tiveram praticamente as mesmas titularidades desde meio da época (J18 - 12 do Palhinha e 11 do Ugarte). Mas para quem viu os jogos, era notório que o Ugarte merecia ter acabado a época a titular, tendo em conta a forma de ambos.

Casper Kelly. Estou sentado à espera.

https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/eu-parliament-greenlights-chat-control-1-0-breyer-our-children-lose-out/ Breyer fundamentally rejects the mass surveillance approach: “Trying to protect children with suspicionless mass surveillance is like frantically mopping the floor while the faucet is still running. Blanket chat control is just as unacceptable as indiscriminately opening everyone’s physical mail. For five years, this failed system has served as a smokescreen to delay real action, all while overwhelming the police with false alarms. We need more child protection, not less—but we need effective protection, not the illusion of security.” What happens next? The interim regulation passed today will remain in effect until 2028, or until an agreement on a permanent regulation is reached. Negotiations for the permanent law will resume in September. The core dispute between the EU Parliament, member state governments, and the EU Commission remains the scanning of private chats: should it be indiscriminate, or targeted at criminal suspects? What changes with the return of Chat Control 1.0—and what stays the same: What is coming back: US tech companies are once again allowed to scan private messages without a warrant or prior suspicion. This affects direct messages on platforms like Instagram, Discord, Snapchat, Skype, and Xbox, as well as emails via Google’s Gmail and Apple’s iCloud. What remains unchanged: Public social media posts and files hosted in cloud storage could already be scanned without this law. Furthermore, private messages can always be reported by users, or monitored by authorities using targeted, court-ordered wiretapping. What is still NOT being scanned: End-to-end encrypted chats, such as those on WhatsApp, have always been exempt from these scans. Additionally, European providers of messaging and email services have never implemented chat control measures. Why Chat Control is the wrong approach: Since 2022, the volume of suspected abuse reports from the US has already dropped by 50 percent due to the growing use of message encryption. According to EU Commission figures, mass scanning of private chats accounted for only 36 percent of all abuse reports in 2024 (the majority came from public posts and cloud storage). The German Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) reports that 48 percent of all incoming alerts are not criminally relevant in the first place. Crime statistics reveal that 40 percent of the resulting investigations actually target minors themselves. Under the chat control system, an estimated 99 percent of reports generated by Meta consist of previously known material, which generally does little to stop ongoing, active abuse. The EU Commission admits there is no evidence that suspicionless scanning of private communications has led to an increase in criminal convictions or in rescued children. Talk of averting a “protection gap” is therefore highly misleading. The most effective law enforcement tools—court-ordered wiretaps, user reports, and the scanning of public platforms and cloud storage—were never at risk and remain fully intact. The only practice that was temporarily banned since April was the indiscriminate, warrantless searching of private, unencrypted messages of innocent people on a handful of US platforms. Background: The deadlock over a permanent solution In parallel, negotiations are ongoing for a permanent regulation to protect children from sexualized online violence (the “CSAM Regulation” or “Chat Control 2.0”). In these talks, the EU Parliament is pushing for a paradigm shift in how we approach online child safety, demanding: Mandatory, targeted detection orders against actual criminal suspects, rather than blanket mass scanning left to the tech industry’s discretion. An EU Child Protection Centre tasked with the systematic removal of known abuse material from the public internet. Strict security standards for messaging apps (“Security by Design”) to prevent cyber grooming. This permanent legislation has stalled because EU member states insist on maintaining the outdated approach of voluntary, suspicionless scanning of private communications. Critics warn that repeatedly extending the interim rules removes the political pressure needed to reach a viable, permanent agreement. Ultimately, clinging to the status quo threatens to derail real progress on child protection. Patrick Breyer sums up the problem: “As long as EU governments can use procedural loopholes to continually extend their comfortable status quo of voluntary, indiscriminate mass scanning, they have zero incentive to engage with the Parliament’s targeted, legally sound, and far more effective child protection strategy. Muito fixe. 👍 Ia me esquecendo de meter os lindões que apoiam: https://fightchatcontrol.eu/#delegates

O Alberto é literalmente o titular do Porto. 😂 Mas sim, a ideia tá aí.

glazer maximus. estavas à espera do quê?

eu disse isto noutro lado mas eu juro que o dias estava a menosprezar o estilo de jogo do quaresma. o que para mim é algo que não me cabe na cabeça 😂

H Y P E

o messi quando se retirar pode ir para sherpa.

hahahahaha