Harry Potter - A saga que marcou uma geração

[Ghelthon]

Seems legit.

[Nanas]

Looooool eu panhava um desses :mrgreen:

[El Shafto]

é tudo um esquema para os mugles pensarem que é um carrinha de raptores, na verdade vai mesmo para hogwarts

[Bumblefoot]

Editado 24 Maio 2012 por Bumblefoot

[Victarion]

[Nanas]

Looool :mrgreen:

[Ed]

 

:mrgreen:

[lagarto.]

http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/398790_347723448615764_1228792526_n.jpg[/ig]

 

:mrgreen:

:lol:

 

Cálice de Fogo lido mais uma vez. Siga para a Ordem de Fénix. :carinhoso:

[Rei_Patricio]

Jé tenho os livros do Quiditch e dos Monstros :celebracao:

[Nanas]

Quando é que vai sair o segundo livro no Pottermore?

[Victarion]

[doom_master]

 

Have fun.

[Tikz]

Quando é que vai sair o segundo livro no Pottermore?

Já estão disponíveis os primeiros quatro capítulos da Chamber of Secrets.

 

Bem, para mim, que fiquei nos Slytherin e ganhámos a House Cup. Fuck yeah. Acho que é só para Slytherin para já. Pelo menos foi com essa impressão que fiquei da mensagem que enviaram.

[Pan]

Amanhã já dá para todos verem.

[Guest Dpitz]

Estava a ler um artigo para a minha tese e encontrei isto:

 

Moscow, Russia: The Moscow prosecutor's office will not pursue a criminal case based on allegations that J. K. Rowling's Harry Potter series incites religious hatred. The office issued the December 31, 2002, decision after investigating a complaint filed by a representative of the International Foundation for Slavic Literature against Rosman Publishing, the Russian publisher of the series.

 

The foundation claimed that Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets "instilled religious extremism and prompted students to join religious organizations of Satanist followers," reported Interfax. Rowling's series is enormously popular in Russia, with more than 1.2 million copies sold.

:lol:

[Naitch]

Can't remember my Pottermore username

 

[Stark]

Hufflepuff:

SpellWave18508 - Naitch

 

pls :mrgreen:

[Naitch]

Tipo.. Coise :heart:

[El Colosso]

Comprei o "Contos do Beetle o Bardo". Curti. E curti a boca da Jo ao pessoal que não quer cenas mas a acontecer nos livros infantis :mrgreen:

[Rōnin]

 

 

 

:lol: :prayer:

 

 

6 anos :(

[Naitch]

Voldebot :prayer:

 

 

Tinha que meter aqui isto que fiz com ele :lol:

[doom_master]

Está a dar o Prisioneiro de Azkaban no AXN.

[lagarto.]

Está a dar o Prisioneiro de Azkaban no AXN.

Nice. Ainda apanho um bocadinho.

[Victarion]

e agora algo interessante:

 

When you tell fantasy or science-fiction stories, you have to pick the things about the universe to change - and then you can't change anything else. If, partway through a Harry Potter story, a Muggle were to show up with a Star Trek phaser, it would be cheating: Harry Potter takes place in the 1990s, and phasers hadn't been invented then.

 

e a resposta:

 

Bad example. Extremely bad. Every single fan knows that time and space don't apply to Harry Potter universe. Just an example: according to the Quidditch Through the Ages, the first world cup was in 1473, but the world cup in GoF is number 422. They repeat every 4 years. There can't be 422 world cups in 521 years with a four-year gap in between. And if that wasn't enough, if there was a world cup, it would be on years 1993, not 1994.

 

And that is just the beginning. If you seriously think Harry Potter universe time is the same as IRL time, you're lead to the conclusion that Andromeda Tonks could have been at most twenty when her daughter was born. Not too unusual, but to make her that young you have to assume that Andromeda and Bellatrix are twins, and both of them quite a bit younger than Narcissa. Oh, also, about Tonks and Teddy: There is time for the pregnancy, but it's really squeezed in there. Tonks was either pregnant when she got married, or very soon after, and behaves as though she's aware of the pregnancy as soon as it would have started. Dudley has a Playstation on year 1994, before its release.

 

But if only it ended like that... nope, small-scale is very messed up too: JK said that the number of students in Hogwarts is around 750. There are fourteen subjects, one teacher per each. On several occasions it's mentioned that there are 20 students in each lesson. Conclusion? All teachers need to be teaching at least 3 classes at the same time. But it keeps getting weirder: as there are five slots a day for classes, so only 25 slots each week. Assuming the teachers get at least one free period a week, that means that they can only have two classes for each grade a week. Which sounds workable, and even allows the 'Doubles' class periods which show up, but then blows up in your face when you realize five required classes, of two hours each is...ten hours. First years have an added flying class, although that can't add more than a few hours a week, and third years and beyond have two electives (Or more if you're Hermione), but second years apparently have a ten hour workweek! Related to this is the fact that Umbridge could not possibly have had time to inspect so many lessons as well as teaching her own. And no, it doesn't end there.

 

A class is an hour long, and they start a 9:00, there probably shouldn't be two classes, a break, and another class before lunch, as the break seems to be at least thirty minutes, possibly an entire hour, and logically pushes lunch to at least 12:30. Then there are a break right after lunch, two more classes, and then free time until dinner. It's not mathematically impossible, but it is a strange schedule, to say the least. Why not have one of those classes after lunch? And why have a break right after lunch? Of course, as statistically they only have enough teachers to be in class two or three of the five slots each day, it really doesn't matter much.

 

Additionally, there's the matter of Ron's older brothers, Bill and Charlie. Originally, JK Rowling stated that Charlie was two years older than Percy, and Bill was two years older than Charlie. However, Percy is in fifth year in "Philosopher's Stone", meaning that Charlie should have either been in seventh year, or just graduated. She later corrected this to Charlie being three years older than Percy - which is still impossible, as the Gryffindor Quidditch team has allegedly not won the Cup since Charlie stopped playing for them, and the period of time since Gryffindor has won is given in "Prisoner of Azkaban" as having been seven years, coming up on eight (or four years before the start of the first book). Charlie would have had to have left the team in his third, or possibly fourth, year for his age at three years older than Percy to be plausible - unlikely, since he was Quidditch Captain and "could have played for England".

 

Also, in Chamber of Secrets, Ginny mentions wanting to attend Hogwarts since Bill came. Bill went to Hogwarts a year after Ginny was born (and that's without the earlier dates from the paragraph above). So Ginny wanted to go to Hogwarts since she was one? Or before she was born? It was also unnecessary because she has 4 older brothers she would've been able to bond with before they went off to Hogwarts. (Of course, she wasn't exactly thinking clearly at the moment.)

 

And DON'T GET ME STARTED ABOUT THOSE SMALL DEUS-EX-MACHINAJK'S-ASSHOLE ABOMINATION MACHINES (more commonly known as the Time Turners)!

 

So, no, Harry Potter was not a good example. Otherwise, all's fine with your post.

 

Edit: Got bestoffed.. well that was unexpected. Just leaving a note here: if you like stuff like this (fucking plotlines up through analysis), then by all means, come join us at the TVTropes. Just a warning, though: it can, and will ruin your life.

porra

tass bem ó JK haha

[El Shafto]

still best book ever, np